Supporting an informed, evidence-based discussion of sunlight reflection methods (SRM).

SRM360 Explorer

News Roundup: James Hansen and SRM, Arctic Ice Project Shuts Down, New MCB Studies, and More

We’re joined by SRM experts: Viktor Jaakkola, Head of Scientific Collaboration at Operaatio Arktis; Michael Diamond, Assistant Professor of Meteorology and Environmental Science at Florida State University; and Rob Bellamy, Senior Lecturer in Climate and Society at the University of Manchester.

How Would SRM Affect Plants?

Plants need sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide (CO2) to photosynthesise. They also need nutrients and the right climate conditions to grow well. Climate change affects these factors, as would sunlight reflection methods (SRM), also known as solar geoengineering, though in different ways.

The Arctic Ice Project Shuts Down

Experts react to the closure of the Arctic Ice Project (AIP), which aimed to slow down the loss of Arctic ice by increasing its reflectivity using very small glass beads.

Given the Political Landscape, Arctic SRM Is Neither Feasible nor Desirable

Nikolaj Kornbech argues that the fraught political landscape in the Arctic makes the region poorly suited for the deployment of sunlight reflection methods (SRM), and that the promotion of Arctic SRM could make matters worse.

The Geopolitics of SRM

We’re joined by geopolitical experts: Olaf Corry, Beth Chalecki, and Josh Horton.

Cooling Credits: Could Paying for SRM Deployment Offset CO2 Emissions?

“Cooling credits” are being offered as a way for companies and individuals to offset their carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by investing in the deployment of sunlight reflection methods (SRM), also known as solar geoengineering. But could SRM really offset the effects of CO2 emissions?